The Continuity Layer
Alternatives · Open models

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash alternatives, graded

thecontinuitylayer.com/alternatives/deepseek-v4-1-flash

3 of the 11 open models on the record score higher than DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash's 5½ of 7 (grade B+): MiMo-V2.6-Pro (6½, A), Phi-4-reasoning-vision-15B (6½, A), Gemma 4 (6, A−) lead the ranking. Every grade is read from the maker's own page, checked 3 November 2026, never from a review.

B+
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash · 5½ of 7
11
open models to compare
3
score higher
3 November 2026
Makers' pages checked

Every open model on the record, ranked

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash’s own row is shaded. The five columns are the tests a person switching asks about first; each product page has every test, with the maker’s line and the source. Where the test is about training, no is the good answer and is colored as such.

open modelGradeLicenseDownloadRuns locallyHosted priceTraining
MiMo-V2.6-Pro#1 · XiaomiA6½/7
Phi-4-reasoning-vision-15B#2 · MicrosoftA6½/7
Gemma 4#3 · Google DeepMindA−6/7
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash#4 · DeepSeek · this oneB+5½/7
Mistral Large 4#5 · Mistral AIB5/7
gpt-oss-120b#6 · OpenAIB5/7
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning#7 · NVIDIAB5/7
Kimi K3#8 · Moonshot AIB−4½/7
Qwen3.8#9 · Alibaba (Qwen)B−4½/7
GLM-5.3#10 · Z.aiC4/7
Muse Spark Open#11 · MetaC−3½/7
Olmo 3.1 32B#12 · Ai2 (Allen Institute for AI)C−3½/7
  • License · Is it under an open license?
  • Download · Can you download its weights?
  • Runs locally · Does the maker say what it takes to run it on your own machine?
  • Hosted price · Does the maker publish a price for its hosted it?
  • Training · Does the maker train on your prompts when you use its hosted it?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash alternatives, by what matters

5 open models under an open license

  1. A MiMo-V2.6-Pro
  2. A Phi-4-reasoning-vision-15B
  3. A− Gemma 4
  4. B gpt-oss-120b
  5. C− Olmo 3.1 32B

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash passes this test too.

5 open models with a published hosted price

  1. A MiMo-V2.6-Pro
  2. B Mistral Large 4
  3. B− Kimi K3
  4. B− Qwen3.8
  5. C GLM-5.3

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash passes this test too.

2 open models whose maker says hosted prompts are not used for training

  1. A MiMo-V2.6-Pro
  2. A Phi-4-reasoning-vision-15B

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash's grade on this test: not stated.

What DeepSeek changed lately

  1. Server-side tool calls on the DeepSeek API, Search and Fetch, are billed at $0.75 per 1,000 successful requests from 00:00 Beijing time on 1 November 2026; they were free before. The deepseek-flash name now points to DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017, and requests to the older deepseek-v4-flash names are served by it at the Flash price.

    source
  2. On September 10, DeepSeek's pricing page said that from September 14 requests to deepseek-v4-pro would be routed to V4.1-Flash and billed at the Flash price, as part of retiring V4 Pro. A day later the same page reversed the plan: V4 Pro API service continues after September 14 with billing unchanged, citing user demand. V4 Pro output stayed at $1.98 per million tokens off-peak and $3.96 peak.

    source

Every change from DeepSeek, dated →

Alternatives to the others

The whole shelf: Open models. How the grades are made: How we grade. No maker pays for a place or a grade.